Farias v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Cristalinda Farias
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 1:2014cv03093
Filed: July 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Yakima Office
County: Yakima
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Whaley
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER GRANTING 37 MOTION FOR PARTY SUBSTITUTION. Alfredo Chino added. Cristalinda Farias terminated. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (AY, Case Administrator)
September 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT in favor of Carolyn W Colvin (CV, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farias v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cristalinda Farias
Represented By: D James Tree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By: Pamela Jean DeRusha
Represented By: Catherine Escobar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?