Next It Corporation v. Roy et al

Case Number: 2:2005cv00380
Filed: December 1, 2005
Court: Washington Eastern District Court
Office: Spokane Office
Presiding Judge: Lonny R. Suko
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 2, 2005 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; SETTING FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND ESTABLISHING SCHEDULE FOR HEARING ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; Granting in part (TR O and OSC) and deferring in part (expedited discovery request) 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; A telephonic hearing will be held on 12/7/05 at 2:00 pm to establish a time and place of the preliminary injunction hearing and to hear portions of Plaintiff's motion requesting expedited discovery. Plaintiff shall post a security in the amount of $2,000 no later than 12/5/05 at 5:00 pm. The TRO shall expire on 12/15/05 at 5:00 pm, unless otherwise ordered by the Court or stipulation of the parties. Signed by Judge Lonny R. Suko. (cc: all counsel that appeared at TRO hearing on 12/2/05) (CV, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Next It Corporation v. Roy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.