Elf-Man LLC v. Lamberson
| Elf-Man LLC |
| Ryan Lamberson |
| Ryan Lamberson |
| Elf-Man LLC |
| 2:2013cv00395 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Spokane Office |
| Spokane |
| Thomas O. Rice |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. All of Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Elf-Man's claims and causes of action in this matter are DISMISSED with prejudice and all of Defendant's counterclaims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ON PENDING PROCEDURAL MOTIONS. Plaintiffs Motions in Response to Defendants First Amended Answer ECF No. 20 are DENIED as to Plaintiffs Special Motion to Strike and DENIED as moot as to all other requests for relief. Defendants Motion to D ismiss or for Leave to File Second Amended Answer ECF No. 21 is DENIED as to Defendants motion to dismiss and GRANTED as to Defendants motion for leave to file a Second Amended Answer. Defendant shall file his Second Amended Answer on or before 3/24/2014. Plaintiffs Motion to Add Additional Defendant ECF No. 28 is DENIED with leave to renew. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Judicial Assistant)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
