Key Tronic Corporation v. Smart Technologies ULC et al
Key Tronic Corporation |
Smart Technologies ULC, VS Electronics Sdn Bhd and Flextronics Sales and Mktg North Asia |
2:2016cv00028 |
February 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Spokane Office |
Spokane |
Thomas O. Rice |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 156 ORDER granting 155 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Defendant Flextronics. Defendant Flextronics Sales and Mktg North Asia is terminated from this action. The file remains open. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal) |
Filing 138 ORDER granting 137 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss VS Electronics Sdn Bhd. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the claims and cross-claims involving VS Electronics Sdn Bhd are dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to either party. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal) |
Filing 136 ORDER granting 134 Motion for Protective Order. All Confidential Material produced during discovery in this matter shall be disclosed and protected as provided in ECF No. 134. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal) |
Filing 128 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT STEEL TECHNOLOGIES MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION. Defendants Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 90 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Request for Jurisdictional Discovery ECF No. 108 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.