Patterson v. Rasmussen et al
| Dennis Wallace Patterson |
| Timothy Rasmussen, Lech Radzimski, Jessica Taylor-Reeves, Kendle Allen, Loren Erdman, Allen Neilson and Gina Tveit |
| 2:2016cv00442 |
| December 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Spokane Office |
| Stevens |
| Rosanna Malouf Peterson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION in favor of Defendants. (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) (AY, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER DENYING 71 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND PROVIDING NOTICE OF POTENTIAL SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. Order sent to pro se Plaintiff via USPS this date. (AY, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER DENYING 66 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. Order sent to pro se Plaintiff via USPS this date. (AY, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION in favor of Aaron William Smith Davis, Billy Reece, J Pedersen, J Stearns, Jeffrey Wayne Evans, Jessica Garza, Justin Young, MA Coon, Patrick Monasmith, Wayne Anthony Gagnon, William Bitton against Dennis Wallace Patterson. (AY, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
11
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION (AY, Case Administrator)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
