Larson v. Department of State
Petitioner: Daniel Kristopher Larson
Respondent: Department of State
Case Number: 4:2014cv05051
Filed: April 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Richland Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Edward F. Shea
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT: the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. In light of thisdismissal and to spare Mr. Larson the financial obligations of thePrison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), IT ISFURTHER ORDERED Petitioners pending application to proceed in formapauperis is DENIED. (SMP, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larson v. Department of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Kristopher Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?