Larson v. Department of State
Daniel Kristopher Larson |
Department of State |
4:2014cv05051 |
April 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Richland Office |
Franklin |
Edward F. Shea |
Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JUDGMENT: the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. In light of thisdismissal and to spare Mr. Larson the financial obligations of thePrison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), IT ISFURTHER ORDERED Petitioners pending application to proceed in formapauperis is DENIED. (SMP, Case Administrator) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Larson v. Department of State | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Daniel Kristopher Larson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Department of State | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.