Conca v. RJ Lee Group Inc et al
| James L Conca |
| RJ Lee Group Inc, Richard J Lee, David K James, Jane Doe Lee and Jane Doe James |
| 4:2015cv05017 |
| February 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Richland Office |
| Benton |
| Edward F. Shea |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - denying 82 Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND, DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING WITH LEAVE TO RENEW IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS - GRANTED in part and DENIED in part 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; DENIED as moot 17 Motion to Strike ; granting 22 Motion to Amend/Correct. All claims against Jane Doe (Sandra) Lee and Jane Doe (Patricia) James are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; granting 16 Defendants' Motion to Amend Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
