Battelle Memorial Institute v. Technology Integration Group Inc
Plaintiff: Battelle Memorial Institute
Defendant: Technology Integration Group Inc
Case Number: 4:2015cv05035
Filed: April 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Richland Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Salvador Mendoza
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE; granting 52 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. (PL, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Battelle Memorial Institute v. Technology Integration Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Battelle Memorial Institute
Represented By: Thomas R Krider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Technology Integration Group Inc
Represented By: Francis S Floyd
Represented By: Nicholas L Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?