Trainor v. Uttecht
Petitioner: Robert Russel Trainor
Respondent: Jeffery A Uttecht
Case Number: 4:2015cv05085
Filed: September 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Richland Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Thomas O. Rice
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION. Petitioners Motion for Reconsideration ECF No. 22 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
December 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. Judgment entered in favor of Defendant Jeffery A Uttecht. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trainor v. Uttecht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Russel Trainor
Represented By: John Gregory Lockwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffery A Uttecht
Represented By: Mandy Lynn Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?