Carideo v. Dell Inc
2:2006cv01772 |
December 13, 2006 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
James L. Robart |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER granting For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS Plaintiffs supplemental Rule 60(b) motion (Dkt. # 71). Plaintiffs are hereby relieved from the order compelling arbitration (Dkt. # 42) and the order denying Plaintiffs original Rule 60(b) motion (Dkt. # 57). Dell shall file its answer to Plaintiffs first amended complaint (Dkt. # 10) within 30 days of the date of entry of this order, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carideo v. Dell Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.