Sicilia v. Boeing Company et al
Joseph Sicilia |
Boeing Company, Carrie Hill, John Doe Hill, Randy Hays and Jane Doe Hays |
2:2009cv00710 |
May 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
XX US, Outside District |
Marsha J. Pechman |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 134 ORDER granting in part and denying in part dfts' 129 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Filing 89 ORDER summarizing rulings made at telephonic conference: The Court (1) grants in part and denies in part 54 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; (2) denies 56 Motion to Compel without prejudice to refile as a CR37 submission; and ( 3) grants 78 Motion to Strike. Subject to the stipulations recited on the record, the parties shall complete fact depositions by September 1, 2010. The deadline for expert reports shall be October 1, 2010 and the deadline for expert discovery shall be October 22, 2010. All other deadlines remain unchanged. Any renewed motion to compel must be filed no later than 10 days from this Order, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RK) |
Filing 43 ORDER DENYING parties' stipulated motion to continue the trial date (Dkt. No. 41): the Court denies the motion without prejudice to file a renewed motion that cures the defects noted in the Order, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.