Gutierrez v. Cort et al
| Michael Gutierrez |
| David Cort, Bob Dalton, Bruce Hoskins and Neil Sharp |
| 2:2010cv01072 |
| June 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Island |
| Thomas S. Zilly |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Party; denying 39 Plaintiff's Motion to appoint a pro bono mediator withou prejudice by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(MD, mailed copy of order to pltf)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. The Court ORDERS plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons and complaint no later than July 21, 2011. The Court DEFERS ruling on Precision's motion to dismiss, docket no. 34 , and RENOTES the 39 motion mediation on July 22, 2011. (CL) (cc: pltf)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. The Court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 10 , and DISMISSES plaintiff's federal discrimination claims against the defendants with prejudice. The Court further GRANTS plaintiff leave to amen d his complaint consistent with this Order. Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint by January 31, 2011. The Court advises plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline may result in dismissal of this action with prejudice.(CL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
