Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc
Microsoft's patent lawsuit against Motorola over Android
Microsoft Corporation |
Motorola Inc |
2:2010cv01577 |
October 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 145 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ACTION by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS) |
Filing 33 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Action by parties. (McCune, Philip) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER to extend time to 11/22/10 for dfts to answer amended complaint by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS) |
Filing 31 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of summons and complaint by counsel Phil McCune and Summit Law Group on behalf of Defendants Motorola Inc, Motorola Mobility, Inc. on 10/28/2010. (Wion, Christopher) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Answer Amended Complaint by parties. (McCune, Philip) |
Filing 29 ORDER re 26 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney David A Nelson for Motorola Inc, and for Motorola Mobility, Inc., by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 28 ORDER re 25 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Charles K Verhoeven for Motorola Inc., and for Motorola Mobility, Inc., by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 27 ORDER re 24 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Edward J DeFranco for Motorola Inc, and for Motorola Mobility, Inc., by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 26 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David Nelson FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Motorola Inc, Motorola Mobility, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2224509. (McCune, Philip) |
Filing 25 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Charles K. Verhoeven FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Motorola Inc, Motorola Mobility, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2224503. (McCune, Philip) |
Filing 24 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Edward J. DeFranco FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Motorola Inc, Motorola Mobility, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2224493. (McCune, Philip) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Philip S McCune on behalf of Defendants Motorola Inc, Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (McCune, Philip) |
Filing 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re 18 Amended Complaint upon Defendant Motorola Inc. on 10/8/10. (McBride, John) |
Filing 21 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. on 10/8/2010 (McBride, John) |
Attorney Arthur W. Harrigan, Jr for Microsoft Corporation added per 10 Notice of Association of Counsel. (KN) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Association of Attorney by Christopher T Wion on behalf of Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Wion, Christopher) |
Filing 19 Summons Issued as to defendant(s) Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (RS) |
Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) All Defendants with JURY DEMAND, filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(McBride, John) |
Filing 17 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Motorola Inc on 10/4/2010 (Killough, David) |
Filing 16 REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT ORTRADEMARK by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation sent to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office via NEF. (MKB) |
Filing 15 Summons issued as to defendant Motorola Inc. (MKB) |
Filing 14 ORDER re 8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Brian Kevin Wheeler for Microsoft Corporation, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) Modified on 10/4/2010 to correct name of attorney (KN). |
Filing 13 ORDER re 7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Brian R. Nester for Microsoft Corporation, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 12 ORDER re 6 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney John W McBride for Microsoft Corporation, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 11 ORDER re 5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Douglas I. Lewis for Microsoft Corporation, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 10 ORDER re 4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Richard A Cederoth for Microsoft Corporation, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 9 ORDER re 3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney David T Pritikin for Microsoft Corporation, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re 14 Order on Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, : Changed name from Brian to Kevin Wheeler (DS) |
Judge Ricardo S Martinez added. (MKB) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kevin C. Wheeler FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2203359. (Killough, David) |
Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Brian R. Nester FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2203348. (Killough, David) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY John W. McBride FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2203339. (Killough, David) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Douglas I. Lewis FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2203332. (Killough, David) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Richard A. Cederoth FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2203324. (Killough, David) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David T. Pritikin FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-2203313. (Killough, David) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRCP 7.1.. (Killough, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Exhibits A to I against defendant(s) Motorola Inc (Receipt # 0981-2203272), filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form120))(Killough, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation | |
Represented By: | T. Andrew Culbert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Motorola Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.