Mangum et al v. Renton School District #403
| Gary F Mangum and Elizabeth W Mangum |
| Renton School District #403 |
| 2:2010cv01607 |
| October 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER BENCH TRIAL by Judge Richard A Jones. (CL) (cc: E. Mangum)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Dft's 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. The bench trial in this case will begin on March 18, 2013, and the parties shall comply with the pretrial deadlines stated at the conclusion of this order. (CL) (cc: pltf)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS the District's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 35 ), but does so without prejudice to the Mangums' opportunity to articulate a Section 504 claim. The Court DENIES the Mangums' motion for summary judgment and their motion to compel. Dkt. ## 32 , 41 . The court VACATES the trial date and all other pending deadlines in this case. (CL) (cc: E. Mangum)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 14 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Richard A Jones. The court enters a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Renton School District from removing the student from its H.O.M.E. program. (JJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
