Vega, Jr v. United States of America et al
| Juan Vega, Jr |
| Pioneer Industries Inc, Heather McIntyre, Bernadette Mathis, Kristen Cortez, Stephanie Jones, Donald Jackson, William Brown, Kevin Straight, Oranda Phillips and United States of America |
| 2:2011cv00632 |
| April 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER granting dfts' 92 Motion for Reconsideration ; striking 98 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; striking 99 Motion to Compel; striking 108 Motion as moot by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc Vega
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying pltf's 93 Motion for Reconsideration ; renoting dfts' 92 MOTION for Reconsideration : Noting Date 2/15/2013, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc Vega
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting dft Pioneer Human Service's et al 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part dft USA's 63 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc Vega
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER ON MOTIONS; granting in part and denying in part dft Pioneer Human Services' 9 Motion to Dismiss; striking as moot pltf's 20 Motion ; granting in part and denying in part dfts USA's 29 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)cc Vega
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
