MacLay v. Sahara M/V, et al
| Julie MacLay |
| Sahara M/V and G Shipping Ltd. |
| Lunde Marine Electronics Inc |
| Lunde Marine Electronics, Inc. |
| 2:2012cv00512 |
| March 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Kitsap |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER AWARDING PREJUDGMENT AND POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, ENTERING JUDGMENT IN REM, AND ORDERING FORECLOSURE SALE OF VESSEL granting pltf's 130 Motion by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) cc USMO
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER on pltf's 88 Motions in Limine by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's 69 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part dfts' 71 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER on plaintiff's 53 Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; striking 58 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; striking 60 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; striking 65 Motion by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting pltf's 41 Motion for Sanctions; granting pltf's 30 Motion to Compel; granting pltf's 32 Motion to permit inspection by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
