Hill v. Xerox Corporation et al
| Tiffany Hill |
| Xerox Corporation, LiveBridge Inc, Affiliated Computer Services Inc and Affiliated Computer Services LLC |
| 2:2012cv00717 |
| April 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| John C Coughenour |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
228
MINUTE ORDER: This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 222 ). Pursuant to LCR 7(h)(3), Defendants may file a response to Plaintiff's motion no later than 4/11/2024. It should not exceed 4,200 words. Plaintiff may file a reply, not to exceed 2,100 words, by 4/18/2024. The Clerk is DIRECTED to re-note the motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 222 ) to 4/18/2024. In addition, Plaintiff filed motions for leave to file overlength motions and briefs (Dkt. No. 224 ) and for relief from the deadline to request such leave (Dkt. No. 225 ). Finding good cause, both motions are GRANTED. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KRA)
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER granting in part and denying in part the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 173 , 183 ). The parties are INSTRUCTED to meet-and-confer and provide the Court with a joint status report within 30 days of this order. The parties are DIRECTED to contact the Court's Courtroom Deputy, Kadya Peter, at Kadya_Peter@wawd.uscourts.gov or (206) 370-8525 to confirm the Court's calendar availability prior to proposing a trial date. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KRA)
|
|
Filing
218
MINUTE ORDER: The Ninth Circuit previously stayed this case, (Dkt. No. 211 ), pending resolution of Defendants' appeal of this Court's order denying Defendant's motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 202 ). On 2/2/2023, the Ninth Cir cuit affirmed this Court's opinion, (Dkt. No. 213 ), and subsequently issued its mandate (Dkt. No. 217 ). Accordingly, the stay is LIFTED and the parties are INSTRUCTED to meet and confer, and to file a joint status report by 9/29/2023, not to exceed six (6) pages, indicating whether the parties would like the Court to consider the pending cross-motions for summary judgement as filed, (Dkt. Nos. 173 , 183 ), or whether they intend to submit updated motions for the Court's consideration. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SB)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 169 Motion to Compel and to partially decertify the class; denying Defendants' 189 Motion to Decertify ABC Class. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (LH)
|
|
Filing
201
MINUTE ORDER granting Parties' 200 Joint Motion to Continue Trial and Modify Pretrial Deadlines. The trial date of October 19, 2020, and all remaining pretrial deadlines are stricken; the parties shall file a proposed joint schedule within 21 days of the Court's resolution of all of the currently-pending motions and cross-motions (Dkt. Nos. 169 , 173 , 183 , and 189 ). Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour.(LH)
|
|
Filing
198
MINUTE ORDER: The Court RENOTES Defendants' motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 169 ) for 5/8/2020. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (MW)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER re parties' 165 Stipulation And Order RE: Use & Protection of Class Member Social Security Numbers. Defendant is authorized to share SSNs of defined class members with the claims administrator, JND Legal Administrations. JND Legal Administrations shall keep the SSNs confidential and use the SSNs only for the purpose of locating and providing notice to defined class members in this case. JND Legal Administrations shall destroy all copies of the SSNs at the conclusion of the notice process. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER granting parties' 161 Stipulated Motion for Approval of Proposed Class Notice and Notice Plan. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
160
MINUTE ORDER pursuant to parties' 159 Stipulation. The Court hereby amends the case schedule as follows: Bench Trial is set for 10/19/2020 before Judge John C. Coughenour. Initial expert reports due by 1/21/2020, Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 2/24/2020, Discovery completed by 3/23/2020, Dispositive motions due by 4/23/2020, Pretrial Order due by 10/5/2020, Trial briefs to be submitted by 10/12/2020. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
157
CORRECTED ORDER re 156 Order Defining Scope of Class. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (MW)
|
|
Filing
141
MINUTE ORDER LIFTING STAY. No later than 7/26/2019, the parties shall file a joint status report informing the Court of the most expeditious way to proceed to resolution of this action. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 117 Motion for Reconsideration and to Amend, by Judge John C Coughenour. (TM)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's 39 Motion to Certify Class; denying 59 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 86 Motion to file surreply by Judge John C Coughenour.(RS)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER granting in part and denying in part dfts' 45 Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part dfts' 53 Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part dfts' 64 Motion to Seal by Judge John C Coughenour.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
