McCoo v. Obenland
Petitioner: Willie James McCoo
Respondent: Mike Obenland
Case Number: 2:2014cv01425
Filed: September 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: Clallam
Presiding Judge: James P. Donohue
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. **13 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Willie McCoo, Prisoner ID: 953064)(RS)
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MINUTE ORDER by Hon. James P. Donohue denying as moot petitioner's 47 MOTION to Amend and 46 MOTION to Amend **2 PAGES, PRINT ALL**(PM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoo v. Obenland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Willie James McCoo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mike Obenland
Represented By: John Joseph Samson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?