Apple Inc v. Mobile Star LLC
Apple Inc |
Mobile Star LLC |
2:2017mc00070 |
July 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. This matter comes before the Court on Amazon.com, Inc.s opposition to plaintiffs motion to compel compliance with a third-party subpoena. In light of the opposition, the Clerk of Court is directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. (CDA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Apple Inc v. Mobile Star LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Apple Inc | |
Represented By: | Charles J Ha |
Represented By: | Aravind Swaminathan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mobile Star LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.