Khalid et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Atm Shafiqul Khalid and Xencare Software Inc
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation and John Doe 1 - n
Case Number: 2:2019cv00130
Filed: January 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Ricardo S Martinez
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 42 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER ( #20-35921) as to #41 Notice of Appeal, filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid (CDA)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 41 NOTICE OF APPEAL to Ninth Circuit (20-35921) re #20 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, #40 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, #37 Order on Motion to Dismiss, #38 Judgment by Court, #28 Order on Motion for Reconsideration,, Order on Motion for Extension of Time,,, by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid. $505, receipt number AWAWDC-6681508 (cc: USCA) (Khalid, Atm) Modified on 10/21/2020 add CCA # (CDA).
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #39 Motion to Reconsider Judgment Order and Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
May 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MOTION for Reconsideration re #37 Order on Motion to Dismiss, #38 Judgment by Court, #20 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, , filed by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EX-4:Khalid Declaration, #2 Amended Complaint Ex-5:Proposed 3rd Amendment, #3 Exhibit Ex-J:Khalid Employee record, #4 Exhibit Ex-K:Miki's Employee Agreement/lawsuit, #5 Exhibit Ex-L:Miki's public statements, #6 Exhibit Ex-M:Citrix RFP 40, #7 Exhibit Ex-N:Citrix meeting log common interest with Microsoft, #8 Exhibit Ex-O:Khalid 30 patent list, #9 Exhibit Ex-P:Micro Data Center market analysis, #10 Exhibit Ex-QPatent Distribution) Noting Date 5/4/2020, (Khalid, Atm)
April 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 JUDGMENT BY COURT. THE COURT HAS ORDERED THAT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. #32 , is GRANTED.Plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. (PM)
April 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting Defendant's #32 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 36 SURREPLY filed by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid re #32 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Khalid, Atm)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 35 REPLY, filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation, TO RESPONSE to #32 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Bradley, Heidi)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #33 Response to Motion: Stricken as duplicative of document #34 Corrected Response, per direction of chambers. (PM)
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 RESPONSE (Corrected), by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid, to #32 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. (Khalid, Atm) Modified on 1/8/2020 to identify as corrected (PM).
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STRICKEN AS DUPLICATIVE of Dkt. #34 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid, to #32 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. (Khalid, Atm) Modified on 1/8/2020 to strike per direction of chambers. Plaintiff filed a Corrected Response as Dkt. #34 (PM).
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 1/10/2020, (Bradley, Heidi)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff's Motion is procedurally improper. In addition to filing this Motion well past the fourteen-day deadline under LCR 7(h)(2), Plaintiff may not use a third motion for reconsideration to circumvent this district's local rules limiting motions for reconsideration to six pages. See LCR 7(e). For these reasons, the Court STRIKES Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration, Dkt. #30, as procedurally improper. Plaintiff is directed to review this district's Local Rules and cautioned against filing additional motions for reconsideration on this issue. (AED)
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Second MOTION for Reconsideration re #20 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, #28 Order on Motion for Reconsideration,, Order on Motion for Extension of Time,,, , filed by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order, #2 Exhibit Ex 1) Noting Date 12/5/2019, (Khalid, Atm)
November 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND, filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I)(Khalid, Atm)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER striking as moot Plaintiff's #24 Motion for Reconsideration; denying Plaintiff's #27 Second Motion for Reconsideration; granting in part Plaintiff's #25 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Second Amended Complaint within seven (7) days of this Order regarding Counts 13, 9 and 11 only. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(PM)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MOTION for Reconsideration re #20 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, , filed by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Proposed Second Amendment Complaint, #2 Proposed Order Order) Noting Date 11/18/2019, (Khalid, Atm)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MANDATE OF USCA (19-35841) as to #21 Notice of Appeal, filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid. The Judgment from USCA takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. DISMISSED. (GT)
October 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MOTION for Extension of Time , filed by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/28/2019, (Khalid, Atm)
October 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MOTION for Reconsideration , filed by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Proposed amendment, #2 Proposed Order Order) Noting Date 10/28/2019, (Khalid, Atm)
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER OF USCA (19-35841, NOT THE MANDATE) as to #21 Notice of Appeal, filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid. DISMISSED. (GT)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER ( #19-35841) as to #21 Notice of Appeal filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (GT)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEAL (19-35841) to Ninth Circuit re #20 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,,, by Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid. $505, receipt number 0981-5950003. (cc: USCA) (Khalid, Atm) Modified on 10/3/2019 to add CCA# (GT).
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting Defendant's #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Counts 1 and 2 (Sherman Act claims) and Count 3 (RICO claim for extortion) are DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend. Count 4 (forced labor), Count 5 (RICO claim for forced labor), Counts 6 and 12 (civil rights claims), and Count 8 (fraud) are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim for declaratory relief on Fourteenth Amendment violation (Count 10) is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's remaining claims for declaratory relief (Counts 9 and 11) are DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order for Counts 1-3, 9 and 11. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) Modified on 9/9/2019 (KB).
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL: Attorney Genevieve Graeme York-Erwin for Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (York-Erwin, Genevieve)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPLY, filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation, TO RESPONSE to #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Bradley, Heidi)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 RESPONSE, by Plaintiffs Atm Shafiqul Khalid, Xencare Software Inc, to #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Khalid, Atm)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER extending initial discovery deadlines per parties' #15 Stipulated Motion. ORDERED that the deadline for the FRCP 26(f) Conference in this matter is extended until one (1) week after the Court issues a decision on Microsoft's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. #14 ); that the deadline for Initial Disclosures is extended until two (2) weeks after the Court's decision on the Motion to Dismiss; and that the deadline for the Combined Joint Status Report is extended until three (3) weeks after the Court's decision on the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(PM)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Initial Discovery Deadlines, filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/20/2019, (Bradley, Heidi)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/28/2019, (Bradley, Heidi)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re: parties' #12 Stipulated Motion. Deadline for Microsoft's answer or motion to dismiss is 6/14/2019, Amended Complaint deadline is 6/14/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 6/14/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 6/21/2019, Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 6/28/2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Time for Defendant Microsoft to Answer or Move to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/13/2019, (Bradley, Heidi)
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Microsoft Corporation (Bradley, Heidi)
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Heidi Brooks Bradley on behalf of Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Bradley, Heidi)
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Attorneys Tiffany Scott Connors, Genevieve Graeme York-Erwin added for Microsoft Corporation; per #10 Notice of Appearance. (MW)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE: Plaintiff Atm Shafiqul Khalid has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (PS)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Microsoft Corporation on 4/25/2019, filed by Plaintiffs Atm Shafiqul Khalid, Xencare Software Inc. (TH)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Microsoft Corporation with JURY DEMAND, filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid, Xencare Software Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(TH)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 5/29/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 5/15/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 5/22/2019, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (cc:Plaintiff via USPS)(LW)
February 28, 2019 Filing 5 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiffs Atm Shafiqul Khalid, Xencare Software Inc (TH)
February 5, 2019 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid, Xencare Software Inc (TH)
January 31, 2019 Filing fee received: $ 400, receipt number SEA094498 (GT)
January 30, 2019 Filing 3 LETTER mailed re IFP deficiency; - The filing fee requirement must be met. Please submit either the full $400.00 filing fee or an application for In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status.- IMPROPER JURY DEMAND: Pursuant to LCR 38(b), the words JURY DEMAND shall be typed in capital letters on the first page immediately below the name of the pleading to the right of the name of the cause. You must file a separate Jury Demand in order to advise the court of this request. Filer has until 3/1/2019 to correct (CDA)cc plaintiff via US Mail with blank IFP form
January 30, 2019 NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Xencare Software Inc must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 2/6/2019. (CDA)cc plaintiff Khalid via U.S. Mail
January 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Summons(es) not received to issue) (Receipt # FEE NOT PAID), filed by Atm Shafiqul Khalid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G, #2 Exhibit H-I, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Email requesting new case)(CDA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khalid et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atm Shafiqul Khalid
Represented By: Atm Shafiqul Khalid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xencare Software Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: Genevieve Graeme York-Erwin
Represented By: Tiffany Scott Connors
Represented By: Heidi B Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1 - n
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?