Brown v. Transworld Systems Inc et al
| Osure Brown |
| Patenaude & Felix, APC, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-2, US Bank National Association, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-1, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-1, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-1, Transworld Systems, Inc., National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-2 and National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-2 |
| 2:2020cv00669 |
| May 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal with State Court re #1 Complaint ; filed by Defendant Transworld Systems, Inc.. (Harris, Emily)
|
|
Filing 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Aston Acquisition Corp. for Transworld Systems, Inc.. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Transworld Systems, Inc. (Harris, Emily)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Notice of Removal against defendant(s) Osure Brown (Receipt # AWAWDC-6313726), filed by Transworld Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Harris, Emily)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
