Frias v. Patenaude & Felix APC
| 2:2020cv00805 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER. To the extent the Court's 1/14/2022 49 order left any pretrial deadlines intact, such deadlines, (see, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 24 , 47 ), are hereby VACATED. The Court will set new deadlines if appropriate based on the parties' forthcoming joint status report. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SB)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying Defendant's 34 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ORDERED that the current trial date is VACATED. Within 30 days of this order, the parties will su bmit a status report addressing the following: (1) a new date for a bench trial and the estimated duration; (2) the possibility of informal resolution; and (3) whether the parties believe further alternative dispute resolution might be appropriate. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SB)
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 37 MOTION to Continue Trial Date Pending Decisions on Cross-Dispositive Motions. Bench Trial is continued to 3/14/2022 at 09:30 AM before U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/21/2022. The Court also RENOTES the pending cross-motions (Dkt. Nos. 33 , 34 ) to 1/3/2022. It is ORDERED that within 7 days of this minute order, the parties must either (1) cause to be filed the required notice under Local Civil Rule 39.1(c)(7); or (2) file a joint status report. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 28 Amended Stipulated MOTION for protective order. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)
|
|
Filing
27
MINUTE ORDER re Parties' 26 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order. The Court DENIES the parties' stipulated motion (Dkt. No. 26 ) without prejudice. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying Parties' 20 Joint Motion For a Judicial Settlement Conference. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour.(MW)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C.'s 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Court STRIKES Mr. Frias's request for civil penalties, DISMISSES his Count for injunctive relief wit hout prejudice, and DISMISSES his CPA claim based on P&F's alleged violation of Washington Revised Code § 19.16.250(16) without prejudice. Mr. Frias may amend the complaint to address the deficiencies identified above within 14 days of the date of this order. The Court is astounded by P&F's stunning lack of appreciation for how irresponsible its conduct in this matter has been. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour.(PM)
|
|
Filing
9
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 6 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Court ORDERS that Defendant must respond to the complaint by July 1, 2020. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frias v. Patenaude & Felix APC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
