Protech Minerals Inc et al v. Suzuki
| Chul Lim Choe and Protech Minerals, Inc. |
| Terry Suzuki |
| 2:2020cv00969 |
| June 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint by Counsel Jack Lovejoy, on behalf of Respondent Terry Suzuki, on 6/23/2020. (Zarmi, David) |
Filing 3
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney David Zarmi for Petitioners Chul Lim Choe and Protech Minerals, Inc., by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
| Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David Zarmi FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Petitioners Chul Lim Choe, Protech Minerals, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6418993 (Sadovnik, Shella) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Vacate Arbitration Award (Receipt # AWAWDC-6418658), filed by Protech Minerals, Inc., Chul Lim Choe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attorney Declaration with Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Order)(Sadovnik, Shella) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
