Microsoft Corporation v. Neodron Ltd et al
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: Neodron Ltd, Atmel Global Sales Ltd and Atmel Corporation
Case Number: 2:2020cv01216
Filed: August 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: James L Robart
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Filing 55 REDACTION to #42 Response to Motion, #44 Sealed Document, Plaintiff Microsoft's Opposition to Neodron's #16 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Culbert, T.) Modified on 10/8/2020 to link to underlying motion (LH).
October 7, 2020 Filing 54 SEALED DOCUMENT Declaration of Andrew Ohlert in Support of Plaintiff Microsoft's Opposition to Atmel Corporation's and Atmel Global Sales Ltd.'s #29 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #50 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Atmel's Motion to Dismiss, #53 Sealed Document, (Fisher, J.) Modified on 10/8/2020 to link to underlying motion (LH).
October 7, 2020 NOTICE TO FILER re #53 Sealed Document: The main PDF attached is the Declaration of Lindsey Dunn, which appears to be a duplicate of Dkt. #51 . The docket indicates that Dkt. #53 is the Declaration of Andrew Ohlert. Please file the Declaration of Andrew Ohlert and link it back to Dkt. #53 . (LH)
October 5, 2020 Filing 53 SEALED DOCUMENT Declaration of Lindsey Dunn And0rew Ohlert in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Atmel Corporaton's and Atmel Global Sales Ltd.'s #29 Motion to Dismiss and Exhibits 1-13 by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #50 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Atmel's Motion to Dismiss, #52 Sealed Document, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13)(Fisher, J.) Modified to link to underlying motion and to note name of improperly uploaded pdf; correction filed at dkt. #54 on 10/8/2020 (LH).
October 5, 2020 Filing 52 SEALED DOCUMENT Plaintiff's Opposition to Atmel Corporation's and Atmel Global Sales Ltd.'s Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #50 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Atmel's Motion to Dismiss, #29 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Fisher, J.)
October 5, 2020 Filing 51 DECLARATION of Lindsey Dunn filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #50 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Atmel's Motion to Dismiss (Fisher, J.)
October 5, 2020 Filing 50 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Atmel's Motion to Dismiss, filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/9/2020, (Fisher, J.)
October 2, 2020 Filing 49 SEALED DOCUMENT Defendant Neodron's Reply In Support Of Its Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Neodron Ltd re #47 MOTION to Seal Reply In Support of Neodron's Motion to Dismiss, #16 MOTION to Dismiss , #48 Reply to Response to Motion (Chung, C)
October 2, 2020 Filing 48 REPLY, filed by Defendant Neodron Ltd, TO RESPONSE to #16 MOTION to Dismiss , #47 MOTION to Seal Reply In Support of Neodron's Motion to Dismiss (Chung, C)
October 2, 2020 Filing 47 MOTION to Seal Reply In Support of Neodron's Motion to Dismiss, filed by Defendant Neodron Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of C. Jay Chung, #2 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/2/2020, (Chung, C)
September 28, 2020 Filing 46 SEALED DOCUMENT Exhibits 1-11 to the Declaration of Andrew Ohlert ISO Microsoft's Opposition to Neodron's Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #40 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Neodron's Motion to Dismiss, #45 Sealed Document, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, #2 Exhibit 3, #3 Exhibit 4, #4 Exhibit 5, #5 Exhibit 6, #6 Exhibit 7, #7 Exhibit 8, #8 Exhibit 9, #9 Exhibit 10, #10 Exhibit 11)(Culbert, T.)
September 28, 2020 Filing 45 SEALED DOCUMENT Declaration of Andrew Ohlert in Support of Microsoft's Opposition to Neodron's #16 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #40 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Neodron's Motion to Dismiss. #29 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #44 Sealed Document, (Culbert, T.) Modified on 10/8/2020 to correct linkage to underlying motion (LH).
September 28, 2020 Filing 44 SEALED DOCUMENT Microsoft's Opposition to Neodron's #16 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #40 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Neodron's Motion to Dismiss. #29 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Culbert, T.) Modified on 10/8/2020 to correct linkage to underlying motion (LH).
September 28, 2020 Filing 43 Redacted DECLARATION of Andrew Ohlert filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Neodron Ltd. #29 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-11 (Redacted))(Culbert, T.) Modified on 10/8/2020 to correct linkage to underlying motion (LH).
September 28, 2020 Filing 42 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation, to #16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Neodron Ltd. #29 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Culbert, T.) Modified on 10/8/2020 to correct linkage to underlying motion (LH).
September 28, 2020 Filing 41 DECLARATION of Lindsey Dunn filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #40 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Neodron's Motion to Dismiss (Culbert, T.)
September 28, 2020 Filing 40 MOTION to Seal Opposition and Supporting Declaration to Neodron's Motion to Dismiss, filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/28/2020, (Culbert, T.)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting Parties' #38 Stipulated Motion to Allow Use of Documents Produced in Related Litigation in This Litigation. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
September 23, 2020 Filing 38 Stipulated MOTION Microsoft Corporation's and Neodron Ltd.'s Stipulated Motion to Allow Use of Documents Produced in Related Litigation in This Litigation, filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. Noting Date 9/23/2020, (Culbert, T.)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER re #30 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Reza Mirzaie for Defendant Neodron Ltd, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge James L. Robart. Joint Status Report due by 10/27/2020, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/6/2020, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/20/2020. (AD)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER re #27 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Eric Anthony Caligiuri for Defendants Atmel Corporation, and Atmel Global Sales Ltd, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER re #26 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Jo Dale Carothers for Defendants Atmel Corporation, and Atmel Global Sales Ltd, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER re #31 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney C Jay Chung for Defendant Neodron Ltd, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
September 21, 2020 Filing 32 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Neodron Ltd (Graham, Lawrence)
September 21, 2020 Filing 31 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY C. Jay Chung FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Neodron Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6610145 (Graham, Lawrence)
September 21, 2020 Filing 30 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Reza Mirzaie FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Neodron Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6610123 (Graham, Lawrence)
September 17, 2020 Filing 29 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendants Atmel Corporation, Atmel Global Sales Ltd. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Atmel's Motion to Dismiss) Noting Date 10/9/2020, (Jensen, Stephanie)
September 17, 2020 Filing 28 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Microchip Technology Inc for Atmel Corporation, Atmel Global Sales Ltd. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Atmel Corporation, Atmel Global Sales Ltd (Jensen, Stephanie)
September 17, 2020 Filing 27 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Eric Caligiuri FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Atmel Corporation, Atmel Global Sales Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6605965 (Jensen, Stephanie)
September 17, 2020 Filing 26 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jo Dale Carothers FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants Atmel Corporation, Atmel Global Sales Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6605950 (Jensen, Stephanie)
September 17, 2020 Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Tyre L. Tindall on behalf of Defendants Atmel Corporation, Atmel Global Sales Ltd. (Tindall, Tyre)
September 17, 2020 Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Stephanie Lynn Jensen on behalf of Defendants Atmel Corporation, Atmel Global Sales Ltd. (Jensen, Stephanie)
September 16, 2020 Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Lawrence D Graham on behalf of Defendant Neodron Ltd. (Graham, Lawrence)
September 15, 2020 Filing 22 REDACTED COMPLAINT to #1 Sealed Document Redacted Version of Microsoft Corporation's Complaint by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Culbert, T.) Modified on 9/16/2020 to expand title of document (PM).
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER re #19 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Andrew Tyler Ohlert for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER re #18 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Lindsey Dunn for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
September 15, 2020 Filing 19 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Andrew T. Ohlert FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6599119 (Fisher, J.)
September 15, 2020 Filing 18 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Lindsey E. Dunn FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-6599110 (Fisher, J.)
September 9, 2020 Filing 17 PRAECIPE to attach document re Note re compliance with LCR 83.2, by Defendant Neodron Ltd (Attachments: #1 Signed Motion to Dismiss)(Graham, Lawrence)
September 9, 2020 NOTE re: Motion to Dismiss #16 . The appearance of attorney Lawrence D. Graham is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (PM) cc: NEF sent to L. Grahm via ad hoc
September 9, 2020 NOTE re Documents #16 , #17 . Appearance of attorney Lawrence D. Graham is not proper, as a Motion to Dismiss does not constitute an appearance. Please refer to LCR 83.2(a). (LH)
September 8, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Neodron Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ciaran O'Gara, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/2/2020, (Graham, Lawrence)
September 8, 2020 Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to Atmel Global Sales LTD. on 8/27/2020, filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Jennison, Judith)
September 3, 2020 Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Atmel Corporation on 8/27/2020, filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Jennison, Judith)
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge James L. Robart granting Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation's #2 Motion to File Complaint Under Seal. The court directs Microsoft to file a redacted version of its Complaint by 15 days after service. (AD)
August 20, 2020 Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Neodron, Ltd. on 8/18/2020, filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Jennison, Judith)
August 17, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney J. Camille Fisher on behalf of Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Fisher, J.)
August 17, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Judith B Jennison on behalf of Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Jennison, Judith)
August 17, 2020 Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Microsoft Corporation (Jennison, Judith)
August 17, 2020 Filing 8 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(CDA)
August 14, 2020 Filing 7 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Jennison, Judith)
August 14, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney J. Camille Fisher on behalf of Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Fisher, J.)
August 14, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Judith B Jennison on behalf of Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Jennison, Judith)
August 14, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Sealed Document - Complaint. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CDA) Modified on 8/14/2020 ad hoc Attorneys Jennison and Fisher (CDA).
August 14, 2020 NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 8/21/2020. (CDA)
August 10, 2020 Filing 3 DECLARATION of J Camille Fisher in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to File Complaint Under Seal filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation re #2 MOTION to Seal (CDA)
August 10, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to File Complaint under Seal, filed by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 8/28/2020, (CDA)
August 10, 2020 Filing 1 SEALED DOCUMENT Complaint with JURY DEMAND by Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (FEE PAID - SEA101581)(CDA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Microsoft Corporation v. Neodron Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: T. Andrew Culbert
Represented By: J. Camille Fisher
Represented By: Judith B Jennison
Represented By: Lindsey Dunn
Represented By: Andrew Tyler Ohlert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neodron Ltd
Represented By: Reza Mirzaie
Represented By: C Jay Chung
Represented By: Lawrence D Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atmel Global Sales Ltd
Represented By: Eric Anthony Caligiuri
Represented By: Stephanie Lynn Jensen
Represented By: Jo Dale Carothers
Represented By: Tyre L. Tindall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atmel Corporation
Represented By: Eric Anthony Caligiuri
Represented By: Stephanie Lynn Jensen
Represented By: Jo Dale Carothers
Represented By: Tyre L. Tindall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?