Evans Fruit Company Inc v. KDLO Enterprises Inc et al
| Evans Fruit Company Inc |
| KDLO Enterprises Inc, Kevin M. Pederson and Donna Mae Pederson |
| 3:2007cv05301 |
| June 15, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Agriculture Acts Office |
| Pierce |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING 41 Agreed Order Reopening Case, Vacating Order of Dismissal of 3/19/08, and Ordering Dismissal Without Prejudice. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN, )
|
|
Filing
37
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Intervening Plaintiffs Curry & Company Inc, Paramount Citrus Association, Seinbeck Country Produce against KDLO Enterprises Inc, Donna Mae Pederson, Kevin M. Pederson signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (This Judgment does not close the case)(JAB, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; GRANTING as to liability and DENYING as to damages. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 2 Motion for TRO; Set Oral Argument on 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Motion for Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 6/28/2007 at 09:00 AM in B Courtroom before Hon. Ronald B. Leighton. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
