Panagacos et al vs. Towery, et al
| Molly Porter, Fibiola Romero, Andrea Robbins, Julia Garfield, Eran Rhodes, Eli Evans, Chris Grande, Davi Rios, Mallory Hagel, Julianne Panagacos, Stephanie Snyder, Emily Cox, Kim Chaplin and All Plaintiffs |
| Clint Colvin, Olympia City of, John J Towery, Thomas R Rudd, Tor Bjornstad, Paul Lower, Jeff Herbig, Steve Nelson, Paul Johnson, James Costa, Cathie Butler, Steve Hall, Gary Michel and 1-500 Does |
| 3:2010cv05018 |
| January 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Thurston |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
399
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing
312
ORDER denying 303 Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order Re: Drew Hendricks; granting Defendant Rudd's Order 310 ; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER on STIPULATION re 126 Stipulation filed by Jeff Herbig, Tor Bjornstad, Paul Johnson, Olympia City of, Steve Hall, Cathie Butler, Paul Lower, Gary Michel, James Costa, Steve Nelson, to Allow Written Discovery Between Plaintiffs and Olympia Defendants, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 76 Defendant Rudd's Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 78 Defendant Towery's Motion to Dismiss, as more fully set forth in this Order, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER denying 102 Defendant Colvin's Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Colvin's Motion to Dismiss as set forth in this Order, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 62 United States' First Motion to Dismiss; granting 75 United States' Second Motion to Dismiss; United States of America has been terminated from this action without prejudice. All claims brought under the Washington State Constitution or sounding in common law tort are dismissed as to Clinton Colvin, John Towery, and Thomas Rudd. Other claims remain pending. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting 74 Motion for Order Changing Caption; United States of America is substituted herein in place of Defendants Rudd and Towery only with respect to claims based on the Washington State Constitution or sounding in common law tort. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, dismissing Plaintiffs' claim based on any alleged mistreatment in jail; DENYING 61 Defendants' Motion for Sanctions, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 46 Motion to change caption to reflect substitution by adding the United States in place of defendant Clint Colvin, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 : Motion for More Definite Statement is GRANTED, plaintiff shall file amended complaint within 14 days of this order; Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 10 Motion for More Definite Statement; plaintiff shall file an amended complaint by 6/1/10; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
