Daniels v. Davis et al
| Shirley O Daniels |
| John S Davis, Stephen Carpenter, Aileen Miller, Kim O'Neil, David Molinaro, John Kuntz, Robert Krabill, Terry Grubb, Carl Whinnery and Jeff Oerlerich |
| 3:2010cv05316 |
| May 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Pierce |
| Karen L Strombom |
| Antitrust |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER granting 58 Defendant Whinnery's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Claims are Dismissed With Prejudice. Any other pending motions are Denied as Moot. Order signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan for Ronald B. Leighton. (order mailed to plaintiff)(JAB)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendants Terry Grubb, Robert Krabill, John Kuntz, Aileen Miller, David Molinaro, Jeff Oerlerich, Stephen Carpenter and John S Davis are DISMISSED from this matter WITH PREJUDICE and have been terminated from this case. Defendants O'Neil and Whinnery survive this case. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 12/17/2010 (DN). (Copy mailed to plaintiff.)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 33 Motion for Recusal; denying 34 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and denying 35 Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 9/30/2010 (DN). Copies of these orders were mailed to the plaintiff by regular mail.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
