EGT, LLC v. Port of Longview
Plaintiff: EGT LLC
Defendant: Port of Longview
Counter_claimant: Port of Longview
Counter_defendant: EGT LLC
Intervenor_defendant: International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 21
Case Number: 3:2011cv05036
Filed: January 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER granting 27 Port of Longview's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 42 Plaintiff EGT's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
July 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 24 Motion for Reconsideration, allowing International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 21 to intervene in this matter. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
June 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER re 24 MOTION for Reconsideration re 23 Order on Motion to Intervene filed by International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 21. Plaintiff is requested to file a Response to the Motion 24 for Reconsideration no later than 6/22/11. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
February 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Port of Longview answer due 3/14/2011. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(CMG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EGT, LLC v. Port of Longview
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EGT LLC
Represented By: Michael A Moore
Represented By: Molly Aneesa Malouf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Port of Longview
Represented By: Diane M. Meyers
Represented By: Adam S. Belzberg
Represented By: Clemens H Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Port of Longview
Represented By: Clemens H Barnes
Represented By: Adam S. Belzberg
Represented By: Diane M. Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: EGT LLC
Represented By: Molly Aneesa Malouf
Represented By: Michael A Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_defendant: International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 21
Represented By: Robert H Lavitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?