Ostrand v. Pacific Tech Construction, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan W. Ostrand
Defendant: Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company and Pacific Tech Construction, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv05806
Filed: September 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Cowlitz
Presiding Judge: Ronald B Leighton
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER on STIPULATION re #13 DISMISSING this matter WITH PREJUDICE and without costs or attorney's fees for any party, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
December 3, 2013 Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Dismissal by Defendants Pacific Tech Construction, Inc., Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 12/3/2013, (Vogel, Angela)
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the notification that this case is settled, the trial and pretrial dates/deadlines are STRICKEN. Dismissal papers shall be due by 12/2/2013. If additional time is needed, Counsel should contact the undersigned clerk to request an extension. s/Jean Boring as authorized by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (JAB)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Stipulated Motion for Extension: 39.1 mediation to be completed by 8/30/2013; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
July 26, 2013 Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION Stipulated Motion and Proposed Order for Continuance of Mediation Deadline by Defendants Pacific Tech Construction, Inc., Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company. Noting Date 7/26/2013, (Vogel, Angela)
December 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER Correcting the due date for the Letter of compliance re #8 Minute Order Setting Trial. 39.1 Compliance Letter is due by 8/12/2013. s/Jean Boring as authorized by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (JAB)
December 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER SETTING TRIAL, PRETRIAL DATES AND ORDERING MEDIATION; Length of Trial: *5 DAYS*. Bench Trial is set for 12/16/2013 at 09:00 AM in B Courtroom before Judge Ronald B. Leighton. Joinder of Parties due by 1/31/2013, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 6/19/2013, Motions due by 7/29/2013, Discovery completed by 8/15/2013, Dispositive motions due by 9/17/2013, Motions in Limine due by 11/12/2013, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 7/31/2013, 39.1 Settlement Report due by 8/10/2012, Pretrial Order due by 11/29/2013, Pretrial Conference set for 12/6/2013 at 08:30 AM in B Courtroom before Judge Ronald B. Leighton. Trial briefs to be submitted by 12/2/2013, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 12/2/2013. s/Jean Boring as authorized by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (JAB)
December 10, 2012 Filing 7 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties estimated Trial Days: 5.. (Vogel, Angela)
September 17, 2012 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Defendants Pacific Tech Construction, Inc., Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company. (Silke, David)
September 17, 2012 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Pacific Tech Construction, Inc., Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company.(Silke, David)
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 12/11/2012, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 11/27/2012, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/4/2012, by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
September 11, 2012 Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from Cowlitz County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (MKB)
September 11, 2012 Judge Ronald B. Leighton added. (MKB)
September 11, 2012 NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1 Defendants must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 9/18/2012, (MKB)
September 10, 2012 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Cowlitz County, case number 12-2-00866-4; (Receipt # 0981-2941150), filed by Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company, Pacific Tech Construction, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Silke, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ostrand v. Pacific Tech Construction, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Tech Development Limited Liability Company
Represented By: David W Silke
Represented By: Angela R. Vogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Tech Construction, Inc.
Represented By: David W Silke
Represented By: Angela R. Vogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan W. Ostrand
Represented By: David A Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?