Scheidler v. Avery et al
Plaintiff: William Scheidler
Defendant: James Avery, Alan Miles, M. Karlynn Haberly and Kay S Slonim
Case Number: 3:2012cv05996
Filed: November 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Kitsap
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER denying 68 Motion to Amend. granting 76 Motion to Dismiss Party; granting 77 Motion to Dismiss; granting 79 Motion to Dismiss; granting 100 Motion to Dismiss: All of Scheidlers claims against all defendants are baseles s and they cannot be saved by additional amendment. They are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. The BoTAs decision denying Scheidlers property tax exemption applications for 2007-2010 is AFFIRMED. Scheidlers BoTA appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(JAB)
October 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER denying 110 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Chief Judge Pechman's Ruling for 'Fraud Upon the Court'; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER denying 56 Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; denying 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; granting 17 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 20 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
December 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DENYING RECUSAL of Judge Leighton. The Motion for Recusal 11 is being referred to Chief Judge Marsha Pechman for further handling. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scheidler v. Avery et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Avery
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan Miles
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Karlynn Haberly
Represented By: Ione S George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kay S Slonim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Scheidler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?