Pelett v. Chase Mortgage

Defendant: Chase Mortgage
Plaintiff: Walter Pelett
Case Number: 3:2013cv05193
Filed: March 14, 2013
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1345 Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 21, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 9 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN) Modified on 5/21/2013 (DN). (cc to pltf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pelett v. Chase Mortgage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase Mortgage
Represented By: Fred B Burnside
Represented By: Daniel Davies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Pelett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.