Northwest Pipe Company v. ThyssenKrupp Steel USA LLC
Plaintiff: Northwest Pipe Company
Defendant: ThyssenKrupp Steel USA LLC
Case Number: 3:2013cv05342
Filed: May 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Ronald B. Leighton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER denying 8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Transfer by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Northwest Pipe Company v. ThyssenKrupp Steel USA LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ThyssenKrupp Steel USA LLC
Represented By: Jeremy D. Sacks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Northwest Pipe Company
Represented By: Carter Matthew Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?