Bryan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff: James H. Bryan
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Case Number: 3:2013cv05934
Filed: October 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Thurston
Presiding Judge: Ronald B Leighton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2016 Filing 23 MANDATE of USCA (14-35235) as to the #19 Notice of Appeal, filed by James H. Bryan. The #21 judgment of this Court, entered October 25, 2016, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (GMR)
December 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER of USCA (14-35235) as to #19 Notice of Appeal filed by James H. Bryan. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc areDENIED. (CMG)
October 25, 2016 Filing 21 MEMORANDUM (Not the Mandate) (14-35235) as to the #19 Notice of Appeal, filed by James H. Bryan. James H. Bryan appeals the district court's grant of Wal-Mart's motion to dismiss. We affirm the ruling of the district court. AFFIRMED. (GMR)
March 27, 2014 Filing 20 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER (14-35235) as to #19 Notice of Appeal, filed by James H. Bryan : The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant James H. Bryan on 03/27/2014. Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/03/2014. Appellant James H. Bryan opening brief due 07/07/2014. Appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. answering brief due 08/04/2014. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. (LMK)
March 27, 2014 Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEAL (14-35235) to Ninth Circuit re #17 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Plaintiff James H. Bryan. (Johnson, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2014; Filing Fee Not Received. (LMK). Modified on 3/27/2014; added CCA case number (LMK).
March 27, 2014 Appeal Fees received: fee in the amount of $ 505 (receipt # SEA62773) re #19 Notice of Appeal filed by James H. Bryan (LMK)
March 5, 2014 Filing 18 JUDGMENT BY COURT (JAB)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #12 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
January 3, 2014 Filing 16 REPLY, filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., TO RESPONSE to #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Johnson, Jamila)
December 30, 2013 Filing 15 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff James H. Bryan, to #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Declaration In Support)(Needle, Jeffrey)
December 17, 2013 Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. on 11/21/2013, filed by Plaintiff James H. Bryan. (Johnson, Daniel)
December 10, 2013 Filing 13 DECLARATION of Roman D. Hernandez filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. re #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F)(Hernandez, Roman)
December 10, 2013 Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 1/3/2014, (Hernandez, Roman)
December 9, 2013 Filing 11 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff James H. Bryan. (Johnson, Daniel)
December 9, 2013 Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name of Attorney Daniel Foster Johnson. Filed by Plaintiff James H. Bryan. (Johnson, Daniel) Modified Address on 12/13/2013 (DS).
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER on the #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Thomas McIntyre Triplett for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(GMR)
December 5, 2013 Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Thomas M. Triplett FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-3438324. (Johnson, Jamila)
December 3, 2013 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jamila A Johnson on behalf of Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Johnson, Jamila)
December 2, 2013 Filing 6 NOTICE REGARDING LACK OF PROPER SIGNATURE. The #4 Notice of Appearance filed on 12/2/2013 was improperly signed by ROMAN D. HERNANDEZ. As such, he was not added to the case and will not receive future notices until corrected. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 11 and LCR 83.2(a), signatures must comply with Section III(L) of the Electronic Filing Procedures, which states, "An electronically filed pleading or other document which requires an attorney's signature must have the signors' names printed or typed on the line and under all signature lines." (GMR- cc: R. Hernandez via ad hoc)
December 2, 2013 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Johnson, Jamila)
December 2, 2013 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jamila A Johnson on behalf of Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Johnson, Jamila)
November 20, 2013 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) James H. Bryan, filed by James H. Bryan.(Johnson, Daniel)
October 21, 2013 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (MKB)
October 21, 2013 NOTICE to Filer - Incorrect divisional office was selected upon case opening. This case has now been assigned a Tacoma case number and judge. All future documents shall reflect this change. (MKB)
October 21, 2013 NOTICE to Filer - JURY DEMAND: Pursuant to LCR 38(b) the words JURY DEMAND shall be typed in capital letters on the first page immediately below the name of the pleading to the right of the name of the cause. The Clerk has removed plaintiff's jury demand flag entered by counsel upon case opening. Counsel must now file a separate Jury Demand in order to advise the court of this request. Thank you. (MKB)
October 21, 2013 NOTICE to Filer - SIGNATURE IMPROPER: The Complaint was improperly signed by Jeffrey Lowell Needle. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 11 and LCR 5(d), signatures must comply with Section III(L) of the Electronic Filing Procedures, which states, "An electronically filed pleading or other document which requires an attorney's signature must have the signors' names' printed or typed on the line and under all signature lines. You do not have to re-file this document, but please be sure all future documents are properly signed. Thank you. (MKB)
October 18, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Receipt # 0981-3384542), filed by James H. Bryan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Johnson, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Represented By: Roman D. Hernandez
Represented By: Thomas McIntyre Triplett
Represented By: Jamila A Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James H. Bryan
Represented By: Jeffrey Lowell Needle
Represented By: Daniel Foster Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?