Embry v. Sinclair

Petitioner: Randall Marquise Embry
Respondent: Steve Sinclair
Case Number: 3:2014cv05360
Filed: May 1, 2014
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Pierce
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Referring Judge: Karen L Strombom
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 7, 2014 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Karen L Strombom granting 11 Motion to Stay; granting 18 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Petitioner shall advise the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving a final State court ruling.(MET) cc: petitioner
May 20, 2014 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Judge Karen L Strombom.(MET) cc: petitioner

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Embry v. Sinclair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Randall Marquise Embry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Sinclair
Represented By: Ronda Denise Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.