Dietz v. United Recovery Systems, LP
Plaintiff: Timothy J. Dietz
Defendant: United Recovery Systems, LP
Case Number: 3:2014cv05840
Filed: October 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: Cowlitz
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion for Order. Plaintiff to file amended complaint by 1/2/2015. (TG; cc mailed to plaintiff)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dietz v. United Recovery Systems, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy J. Dietz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Recovery Systems, LP
Represented By: Elizabeth Rankin Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?