Nash vs. Lucas
| Keith L Nash |
| Gary E Lucas |
| 3:2014cv05851 |
| October 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Clark |
| J Richard Creatura |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER granting 99 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 134 Plaintiff's Motion to File a Surreply; this matter is closed; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.**4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Keith Nash, Prisoner ID: 769885)(DN)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER by Judge Ronald B. Leighton granting in part 92 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion; granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion. ***See order for details. **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Keith Nash, Prisoner ID: 769885)(MET)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 70 Motion to Compel; denying 71 Motion to Disqualify by Judge David W. Christel.(MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER by Judge David W. Christel denying 55 Motion for Court Ordered Conference Hearing; denying 57 Motion for and Order to Obtain Court Reporter; denying 58 Motion to Discharge Defense Counsel and to Impose Sanctions; finding as moot 66 Motion for Extension of Time. (MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by First Class Mail by Judge David W. Christel. Mailed on 7/21/2015 to Defendants and Clark County Prosecutor. (MET) cc: plaintiff with pro se sheet
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 39 Denying as Moot Defendant Lucas's Motion to Dismiss; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 7/16/2015 (DN). (cc to pltf)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER by Judge David W. Christel denying 27 Motion to Strike; granting 29 Motion to Amend; denying 30 Motion to Compel; granting 33 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is directed to file his Second Amended Complaint by 7/17/2015. Discovery to be completed by 8/18/15. (MET) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class Mail signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. Mailed on 11/12/14 to Defendant and Prosecutor. (MET) cc: Plaintiff w/pro se sheet.
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER to provide more information signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. The Court orders that plaintiff clarify how much money he has in his bank accounts. Plaintiff must also inform the Court whether his pension or annuities payment is monthly or yearly. The Court gives plaintiff until November 28, 2014 to provide this information.(MET) cc: plaintiff
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nash vs. Lucas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keith L Nash | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gary E Lucas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
