Eckard v. Glebe et al
| Gabriel Eckard |
| Pat Glebe and William Swain |
| 3:2014cv05898 |
| November 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Grays Harbor |
| Robert J. Bryan |
| Karen L Strombom |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER adopting the 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's motion for summary judgment 25 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's claim relating to cell checks (June 2, 2014 to June 9, 2014) is dismissed with prejudice; his remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan.(CMG)(cc to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER that Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendant's 25 motion for summary judgment by September 14, 2015. The Clerk shall re-note Defendant's motion for summary judgment 25 for September 18, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE of Amended Complaint by 1st Class Mail; mailed on 3/16/15 to Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class Mail. Mailed to defendants on 11/14/14.Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff w/instruction sheet)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
