Nash v. Lucas et al
Keith L Nash |
Garry E Lucas, Dougher, Richard J Bishop, Anderson, Nagy, Huff and Holopeter |
3:2014cv05996 |
December 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tacoma Office |
Clark |
J Richard Creatura |
Ronald B. Leighton |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 17 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Keith L Nash; Dismissed, amended complaint failed to state a claim; counts as a strike; in forma pauperis status revoked for appeal; signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN) Modified on 4/24/2015 (DN). (cc to pltf) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Amend. The Clerk's office is directed to file the proposed amended ocmplaint. The Court does not order service of process. The Court will issue a separate Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Filing 12 ORDER denying 10 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Court's denial is without prejudice and on or before 3/13/15, plaintiff may file a new motion to file an amended complaint that includes a proposed amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why the 7 Complaint should not be dismissed as frivolous. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. Show Cause Response due by 2/13/2015. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.