Fitch v. Fitch
Petitioner: Sherelle Marie Fitch
Respondent: Neal Jones Fitch
Case Number: 3:2015cv05233
Filed: April 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Benjamin H. Settle granting in part and reserving ruling in part re 4 Motion for Expedited Hearing. In-court Hearing set for 4/24/2015 at 11:00 AM in E Courtroom before Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (TG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitch v. Fitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sherelle Marie Fitch
Represented By: Paul W McVicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Neal Jones Fitch
Represented By: David Brendan Starks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?