Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Danner et al
Union Pacific Railroad Company |
David W Danner and Ann Rendahl |
3:2022cv05544 |
July 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tana Lin |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant David W Danner. Noting Date 10/7/2022, (Roberson, Leonard) |
Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Tana Lin. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/12/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/26/2022, Joint Status Report due by 11/9/2022. (KMP) |
Attorney Leonard Jeffrey Roberson for Ann Rendahl added per #11 Notice of Appearance. (KMP) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Leonard Jeffrey Roberson on behalf of Defendant David W Danner. (Roberson, Leonard) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: The Court has posted Chambers Procedures at http://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-procedures. All counsel and unrepresented ("pro se") parties are DIRECTED to review them, if they have not already done so. Failure to follow the requirements set forth in the Chambers Procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions. (KMP) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455 AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Tana Lin. (KMP) |
Filing 8 Summonses Electronically Issued as to defendants David W Danner, Ann Rendahl. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(AMD) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Noah Fitzgerel for Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC) |
Filing 6 ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Tobias S Loss-Eaton for Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC) |
Judge Tana Lin added. (AMD) |
Filing 5 ERRATA re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Reynolds, Rachel) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation for Union Pacific Railroad Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Reynolds, Rachel) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Noah Fitzgerel FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7643914 (Reynolds, Rachel) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Tobias S. Loss-Eaton FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7643874 (Reynolds, Rachel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-7643838), filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Ann Rendahl, #3 Summons David W. Danner)(Reynolds, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.