Malone v. State of Washington et al
Plaintiff: Mark A Malone
Defendant: State of Washington, Kenneth Clark, John D Snaza, Donald R Peters and Jon Tunheim
Case Number: 3:2023cv05493
Filed: May 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
Presiding Judge: David W Christel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Reconsideration re #13 Order to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff Mark A Malone. Noted by Clerk for 8/11/2023. (ZMG)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge David W. Christel. Amended Complaint, if any, is due on or before 7/17/2023. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (KEB)
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 LETTER from Clerk to parties re receipt of case from the District of Utah and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (AMD - cc: Pltf via USPS)
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Case transferred in from the District of Utah, Case Number 2:23-cv-00197. (AMD)
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND TRANSFER ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 5/31/2023. (alf) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge David W. Christel added. (AMD)
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #5 Order to Show Cause, filed by Mark A. Malone. (alf) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Untitled document. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (alf) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Mark A. Malone. (alf) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Mark A. Malone. (alf) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why the Complaint should not be dismissed for improper venue or transferred to a different District. Plaintiff is directed to respond to the court in writing no later than April 18, 2023. Failure to do so may result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed or transferred for improper venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 4/4/2023. (alf) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. 1. Because Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court will screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and Local Civil Rule DUCivR 3-2(b). 2. Plaintiff may complete and return forms provided by the court. The clerks office is directed to provide Plaintiff with the magistrate judge consent/reassignment form and the email filing and electronic notification form for unrepresented parties. 3. Other than court forms, Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. If such documents are filed, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until screening is completed.4. The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. 5. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on the defendant(s). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 3/27/2023. (ks) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
March 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Mark A. Malone. Form due by 4/14/2023. (alf) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, exhibits, motion for counsel and civil cover sheet.. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit 2. Nature of Case, #3 Exhibit 3. Cause of Action, #4 Exhibit 4. Injury, #5 Exhibit 5. Parties, #6 Exhibit 6. Legal Conclusions, #7 Exhibit 7. Request for Relief, #8 Exhibit 8. Table of Authorities, #9 Exhibit 9. All Sort of Docs, #10 Motion for Counsel, #11 Civil Cover Sheet).(haa) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.]
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 03/23/2023) filed by Plaintiff Mark A. Malone. (haa) [Transferred from utd on 5/31/2023.] Modified on 5/31/2023 to unseal image - not a sealed doc in WAWD (AMD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malone v. State of Washington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark A Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John D Snaza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald R Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jon Tunheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?