Erickson v. USA
Petitioner: Benjamin M. Erickson
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2010cv00208
Filed: April 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Chippewa
Presiding Judge: Barbara B. Crabb
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JUDGMENT denying petitioner Benjamin M. Erickson's motion for postconviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (PAO) (arw)
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Benjamin M. Erickson. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/5/2010. (arw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erickson v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Stephen Paul Sinnott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Benjamin M. Erickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?