Sid Tilstra et al v. Bou-Matic, LLC
| Sid Tilstra and Tilstra Dairy Equipment, LTD |
| Bou-Matic, LLC |
| 3:2012cv00827 |
| November 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
ORDER denying 130 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; denying 131 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 132 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/19/2014. (arw)
|
|
Filing
116
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendant Bou-Matic, LLC dismissing plaintiffs' claim for tortious interference with contract; entered in favor of plaintiff Tilstra Dairy Equipment, Ltd. against Bou-Matic, LLC in the amount of CAD$471,124.00 based on the jury's finding that defendant breached the implied duty of good faith in its dealership agreement with Tilstra Dairy Equipment, Ltd. (SLC/PAO) (arw)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Bou-Matic, LLC. The motion is GRANTED as to plaintiffs' claim for tortious interference with contract; that claim is DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations. The motion is DENIED as to plaintiffs' claim for breach of contract. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/4/2014. (arw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
