Kissick, Michael v. Huebsch, Michael et al
| Michael Kissick |
| Michael Huebsch and David Erwin |
| 3:2013cv00099 |
| February 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants are enjoined from enforcing content-based distinction found in section 3.J and the permitting requirement generally, as applied to events in the Capitol that are anticipated to attract 20 or fewer persons. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/8/13. (rep)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER denying 50 Motion to adjourn preliminary injunction hearing. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/16/2013. (lak)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER setting schedule re: 2 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Michael Kissick. Response due 3/19/13. Reply due 4/2/13. Injunctive hearing set for 4/17/13 at 8:00 am. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/26/13. (rep)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER that plaintiff is to promptly file proof of service of the summons, complaint, motion and support documents. Upon receipt of proof, the court will schedule a conference to set deadlines for plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/14/13. (rep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
