Davis, Jeffrey v. Divine Savior Hospital et al
| Jeffrey M. Davis, Jr. |
| Divine Savior Hospital, Jackson, Charles Boursier and Gerald Krumpos |
| 3:2013cv00101 |
| February 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case without prejudice. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that the motion by plaintiff Jeffrey M. Davis for a preliminary injunction (dkt. # 4 ) is DENIED. The motion to dismiss by Dr. Gerald Krumpos for insufficient service of process (dkt. # 34 ) is GRANTED. The motion for voluntary dismissal by p laintiff Davis (dkt. # 39 ) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The motion to dismiss, supplemental motion to dismiss and motion to seal exhibits filed by Divine Savior Hospital, Dr. Boursier and Dr. Jackson (dkt.# 30 , # 32 and # 41 ) are DENIED as MOOT. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/24/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 6.69 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 3/5/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 2/12/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
