U.S. Water Services, Inc. v. Novozymes A/S et al
| U.S. Water Services, Inc. |
| Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. |
| 3:2013cv00864 |
| December 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
911
AMENDED JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. against plaintiffs U.S. Water Services, Inc. and Roy Johnson finding that claims 1, 6 and 12 of the '137 patent and claims 1, 2, 5, 7-9, 16 and 18-20 of the '399 patent are invalid as anticipated by prior art. (JDP/ARW)
|
|
Filing
745
ORDER. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/9/2017. (jmm)
|
|
Filing
565
ORDER granting 564 Motion to Stay Post-Judgment Proceedings. Any motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) for taxation of costs or for an award of attorney fees must be filed by: (1) 14 days after the deadline to file a notice of a ppeal, if neither party appeals the judgment; (2) if either party appeals the judgment, 30 days after the issuance of a mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, if defendants are still prevailing parties; or (3) by a date set by further order of this court if neither (1) nor (2) applies. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/13/2015. (jls)
|
|
Filing
561
ORDER granting 273 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 199 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 182 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment that claims 1, 6, 12 a nd 13 of the '137 patent, and claims 1, 2, 5-12, 16-22, 25, 28-32, 34 and 35 of the '399 patent are invalid is GRANTED. Defendants' motion is DENIED as moot in all other respects. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of inequitable conduct is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED as moot in all other respects. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/29/2015. (jls) Modified on 7/29/2015. (arw)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying 28 Motion to Transfer to District of Minnesota; denying 25 Motion to Dismiss amended complaint; denying as moot 57 Motion to Stay discovery; granting 71 Motion to Compel discovery. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/11/14. (krj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
