United States of America v. Meisegeier et al
| United States of America |
| Larry A. Meisegeier, Emily B. Meisegeier, Wymore Seed and Farm Supply, Marshfield Clinic, David Krumrei, Bonita Perry, Sheldon Co-Op Services and Herdsman Feeds, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv00065 |
| February 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Rusk |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER that the remaining $3,197.06 be paid to defendants Emily and Larry Meisegeier. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/19/2015. (jef/cc: all defendants via U.S. mail),(ps)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying David Krumrei and Bonita Perry's 42 Petition for Equitable Distribution of Surplus. Wymore Seed and Farm Supply's request for surplus funds (dkt. ## 43 , 48 ) is DENIED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART as set forth within this order. Defendants Emily and Larry Meisegeiers' request for surplus funds (dkt. # 49 ) is GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $38,388.264 and STAYED IN PART in the amount of $3,197.06. Within thirty days, Wymore should inform the court if he has filed a collateral challenge to the order of satisfaction in state court, and if so, the case number of that challenge and a copy of his filing. If satisfactory, the court will transfer the remaining surplus to that court pending resolution of his challenge. If not, the court will release the surplus to the Meisegeiers. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/29/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting the United States of America's 38 claim on the surplus funds. Not later than May 18, 2015, claimants Wymore Seed and Farm Supply, David Krumrei and Bonita Perry should file with the court proof of their judgment against defendants Larry and Emily Meisegeier, as well as proof of a lien on the subject property. At that time, claimants should also inform the court, to the best of their knowledge, whether Larry and Emily Meisegeier filed an application for satisfaction of judgment due to bankruptcy pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.19(4). Not later than May 26, 2015, the Meisegeiers should file a written response with the court addressing the asserted claims on the surplus and explaining why they should not be held in default with respect to those claims. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/8/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER that the sale of the mortgaged premises involved in the above action to Cliff and Lynnette Brown, for the sum of $172,000.00, and the United States Marshal's report of sale, are hereby in all things APPROVED AND CONFIRMED. Any party wishing to assert an interest in this surplus shall have FOURTEEN (14) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER to file a written claim stating the amount, basis for the claim and, if applicable, any claimed priority. Any remaining surplus from the sale shall REVERT to Larry A. and Emily P. Meisegeier. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/18/15. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT of Foreclosure and Sale entered in favor of Plaintiff United States of America against Defendants Larry A. Meisegeier, Emily B. Meisegeier, Wymore Seed and Farm Supply, Marshfield Clinic, David Krumrei, Bonita Perry, Sheldon Co-Op Services, and Herdsman Feeds, Inc. in the amount of $ 126,668.53. (WMC /PAO). (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
