Kawczynski, Ricky v. Ritchie Lakeland Oil et al
| Ricky J. Kawczynski |
| Ritchie Lakeland Oil and Joe Ritchie |
| 3:2014cv00125 |
| February 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Oneida |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER denying defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may have until December 8, 2014 to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for his failure to have complied with the Clean Water Act's notice requirements. Unless plaintiff can show that he has complied with the notice requirements, his case will be dismissed without prejudice to his refiling it after he does so. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/18/2014. (jef),(ps) Modified on 11/18/2014 (jef).
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER that the 7 motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed by defendants Ritchie Lakeland Oil and Joe Ritchie is GRANTED. Plaintiff Ricky J. Kawczynski may have until August 25, 2014, to file an amended complaint that address es the problems discussed in this order. If plaintiff does not respond by August 25, 2014, the clerk of court will enter judgment dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and close the case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/04/2014. (nln),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
