Ailts Campeau, Danielle v. Neuroscience, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Danielle Ailts Campeau
Defendant: Neuroscience, Inc. and Pharmasan Labs, Inc.
Counter_claimant: Pharmasan Labs, Inc. and Neuroscience, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Danielle Ailts Campeau
Case Number: 3:2014cv00324
Filed: May 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: St. Croix
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 52 AMENDED ORDER re 49 Joint Proposed Notice of Class Action. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/27/2015. (voc)
January 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER re 49 Joint Proposed Notice of Class Action. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/27/2015. (voc)
January 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION & ORDER granting 16 Motion for Conditional Certification of Class; granting 37 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Title VII class claims are dismissed with prejudice. The parties are directed to confer and amend the proposed class notice as outlined in the opinion. The parties must submit a revised proposed notice no later than January 26, 2015. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/15/15. (jat)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ailts Campeau, Danielle v. Neuroscience, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Ailts Campeau
Represented By: Joshua A. Newville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neuroscience, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Rose Cefalu
Represented By: Henry M Helgen, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pharmasan Labs, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Rose Cefalu
Represented By: Henry M Helgen, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Pharmasan Labs, Inc.
Represented By: Henry M Helgen, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Neuroscience, Inc.
Represented By: Henry M Helgen, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Danielle Ailts Campeau
Represented By: Joshua A. Newville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?