Linderman, Diana v. Mt. Olympus Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Diana Linderman |
| Mt. Olympus Enterprises, Inc. and Mt. Olympus Resorts, LLC |
| 3:2014cv00435 |
| June 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Sauk |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER: Plaintiff Diana Lindeman may have until October 5, 2015, to file a trial brief in which she explains the scope of all the theories that she intends to assert at trial and summarizes how she intends to prove each of those theories at trial. Defendant Mt. Olympus Enterprises, Inc. may have until October 16, 2015 to file a response. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/24/15. (jat)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying as unnecessary 36 Motion for Clarification. The parties are to inform the court whether they believe that plaintiff is proceeding on any other theories other than negligence in securing the restraints on plaintiff's car by August 26, 2015. Responses to the other side's submission are due by September 2, 2015. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/12/2015. (jls)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Regarding Jurisdiction. Proof of Diversity Citizenship due 8/10/2015. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/3/15. (jat)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
